I have been engaging in a exploration to try to understand or to find out a methods that allow me to capture and make my prints collection visible to others. Not on the design of the way to present the print artifacts but also the organization of the material and the information I have. So far I been digging in ideas from few design research methods such as Brenda Lauren, Philip Meggs and Steven Heller. In America there are quite a few books that is publish as a collections of many graphic design work throughout the years. This is interesting as I find it very similar to what I am exploring with Malaysian Artifacts. I am intended to try these methods and hopefully I will be able to work this process out.
The questions I am having running around my head is firstly ‘How do I organize the print artifacts that I collected and make them visible to others? What kind of direction I should take? Is there any model I would be able to follow in doing this?
Secondly, If the focus of my study is to explore and investigate how the concept of Malaysian identity has been manufactured or constructed through stereotypical iconography, then how does this collection of print artifacts would be able to demonstrate my argument?
In the process of exploring the methods that will work in demonstrating my print materials, I am also reflecting on the process of discoveries itself. In doing the process of finding the methods, I also realized how long hours I have spend on Adobe Photoshop software. Cropping, re-touch images, changing the sizes of the images and many other is part of the graphic designers job. In my situation, the images that I have are pretty old, on top of that I only have them in hard copy and there is none that is available in digital, apart from some efforts making by few Malaysian designers. Therefore scanned or photo shooting is also part of the process, before we even get to the reconstruction process.
Anyway, got to go and continue retouching my imagery, I will update the blog hopefully in few days. Meanwhile, to whom who celebrate Christmas, Merry Christmas and for the new life in 2010, Happy Jolly New Year and hope all your wishes may all comes true!
Now, this is an interesting efforts. I think it should be more. A site call Malaysian Design Archive is up and waiting for people to contribute adding the collection. If you have any printed material that you think could help to add in the collections of Malaysian design archive then join in. We need more of this going. Ezrena is one of many Malaysian graphic designer who feel the needs to start making the collections available to others. I think too. In my study, one of the findings is there is not archive of Malaysian graphic ephemeral available to public. I know that News Straits Times keeps the collections of the newspapers since they started, but that is only one part of graphic ephemeral, what about others? What about the poster for elections for examples, the promotions printed material from Tourism Malaysia, flyers or brochures promoting some vernacular Malaysian products? How do we trace the Malaysian graphic design evolution or identity if these materials are not available for us to refer to, and how can we claimed that we are this and we are that as a Malaysian if our roots of origin is still vague and confuse. Now, please correct me if I am wrong but, so far, through my research trip up and down from Malaysia to Melbourne, I didn’t come across this collection of graphic ephemeral in national collections such as library, and national archive. Nothing. We need to start collecting and share this collection with others so that we can understand our own culture, questions where it belong to and start to considered a lot of issues before we make any claim that it is authentically Malaysian. Designers will be able to refer to something that is local, and not to the western literature and design book.
In my research I have collected from second hand book shops and personal collectors, Malaysian advertisements from 1957 to 2007. Of course this collections is not complete but it is still an on going process. Now why do I stop on year 2007? Well, I thought 50 years is a descent time to see the evaluation of Malaysian identity, enough time for me to work on, of course there are possible future research that will rise from this, which I think is great. That means there are still gaps to be filled in relation to Graphic Design in Malaysia. Would be wonderful to be able to write about this, as I think that is what lacking in Malaysia. Most of Malaysian graphic designer are confuse and lost with the idea of their national identity, why? Well, one good reason is because we don’t have much literature to refer to, apart from the western graphic design literature and perspective.
Here are samples of the collection I have in hand, I am still collecting. If you have any of them please let me know. Thanks.